- Home
- About
-
EDITORIAL POLICIES
Peer Review Process Editorial Process Publication Ethics Authorship & Contributorship Conflict of Interest Research Misconduct Plagiarism & Similarity Screening Ethical Oversight Research Data & Reproducibility Complaints & Appeals Corrections & Retractions Article Withdrawal Policy Post-Publication Discussion Special Issue Policy Artificial Intelligence (AI) Policy
- OPEN ACCESS & RIGHTS
- FOR AUTHORS
- PRESERVATION & IDENTIFIERS
- Archives
- Search
Complaints & Appeals
The journal provides a fair and transparent process for complaints and editorial appeals.
Complaints may concern:
- peer review;
- editorial procedures;
- publication ethics;
- reviewer conduct;
- editor conduct;
- published material; or
- journal administration.
Complaints must be submitted to the Editorial Office with sufficient explanation and supporting evidence.
Authors may appeal an editorial decision where they believe a substantive factual, procedural, methodological, or scholarly error affected the outcome.
If a complaint concerns the Editor-in-Chief, it must be handled by [Independent Senior Editor / Publisher Representative / Ethics Committee] who was not involved in the original decision.
An appeal does not automatically result in reversal of the original decision.
Related Policies:
Peer Review Process | Conflict of Interest | Publication Ethics