- Home
- About
-
Editorial Policies
Peer Review Process Editorial Process Publication Ethics Authorship & Contributorship Conflict of Interest Research Misconduct Plagiarism & Similarity Screening Ethical Oversight Research Data & Reproducibility Complaints & Appeals Corrections & Retractions Article Withdrawal Policy Post-Publication Discussion Special Issue Policy Artificial Intelligence (AI) Policy
- Open Access & Rights
- For Authors
- Preservation & Identifiers
- Archives
- Search
Editorial Process
The editorial workflow follows the sequence:
Submission → Administrative Screening → Editorial Screening → Similarity Screening → Reviewer Assignment → Double-Blind Peer Review → Author Revision → Editorial Evaluation → Final Decision → Copyediting → Proofreading → Production → Publication
Editorial decisions are based exclusively on academic considerations, including:
- originality;
- scholarly contribution;
- methodological quality;
- relevance to Islamic studies;
- ethical integrity;
- clarity of argument; and
- compliance with journal policies.
An author’s nationality, religion, ethnicity, institutional affiliation, gender, academic rank, political position, or ability to pay publication charges must not influence the editorial decision.
Manuscripts submitted by editors or individuals closely associated with the journal must be handled by an independent editor to prevent conflicts of interest.
Related Policies:
Peer Review Process | Publication Ethics | Conflict of Interest | Article Processing Charges