- Home
- About
-
Editorial Policies
Peer Review Process Editorial Process Publication Ethics Authorship & Contributorship Conflict of Interest Research Misconduct Plagiarism & Similarity Screening Ethical Oversight Research Data & Reproducibility Complaints & Appeals Corrections & Retractions Article Withdrawal Policy Post-Publication Discussion Special Issue Policy Artificial Intelligence (AI) Policy
- Open Access & Rights
- For Authors
- Preservation & Identifiers
- Archives
- Search
Post-Publication Discussion
The journal supports responsible academic discussion after publication.
Readers and researchers may report:
- factual errors;
- methodological concerns;
- inaccurate references;
- ethical issues;
- data problems;
- attribution concerns; or
- other substantial issues
to the Editorial Office.
The journal will evaluate credible concerns objectively and may request a response from the authors.
Depending on the findings, the journal may publish:
- an author response;
- correction;
- clarification;
- expression of concern; or
Academic criticism submitted in good faith will be evaluated based on scholarly evidence.
Related Policies:
Corrections and Retractions | Complaints and Appeals | Publication Ethics