- Home
- About
-
Editorial Policies
Peer Review Process Editorial Process Publication Ethics Authorship & Contributorship Conflict of Interest Research Misconduct Plagiarism & Similarity Screening Ethical Oversight Research Data & Reproducibility Complaints & Appeals Corrections & Retractions Article Withdrawal Policy Post-Publication Discussion Special Issue Policy Artificial Intelligence (AI) Policy
- OPEN ACCESS & RIGHTS
- FOR AUTHORS
- PRESERVATION & IDENTIFIERS
- Archives
- Search
Complaints & Appeals
The journal provides a transparent and fair procedure for complaints and appeals.
Complaints may relate to:
- editorial procedures;
- peer-review processes;
- ethical concerns;
- reviewer conduct;
- editor conduct;
- published articles;
- administrative procedures; or
- other journal activities.
Complaints should be sent to the Editorial Office and should include sufficient details and supporting evidence.
Authors may appeal an editorial decision if they believe that a significant factual, procedural, or scholarly error affected the decision.
An appeal must clearly explain the academic basis for reconsideration.
The journal does not reconsider a decision solely because an author disagrees with reviewer comments.
If a complaint concerns the Editor-in-Chief, the matter must be referred to [Publisher Representative / Independent Senior Editor / Ethics Committee] who was not involved in the original decision.
An appeal does not guarantee reversal of an editorial decision.
Related Policies:
Peer Review Process | Conflict of Interest | Publication Ethics